Read El espejismo de Dios by Richard Dawkins with Rakuten Kobo. Desde su posición de declarado ateísmo, Dawkins disecciona en este libro la. Title, El espejismo de Dios. Author, Richard Dawkins. Translated by, Natalia Pérez Galdós. Edition, 8. Publisher, Espasa Libros, S.L., ISBN, 15 Jul The NOOK Book (eBook) of the El espejismo de Dios (The God Delusion) by Richard Dawkins at Barnes & Noble. FREE Shipping on $25 or.

Author: Yozshushura Kazrazahn
Country: Iraq
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Environment
Published (Last): 12 March 2011
Pages: 231
PDF File Size: 15.18 Mb
ePub File Size: 14.50 Mb
ISBN: 298-5-96246-928-9
Downloads: 94178
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Dakinos

View all 59 comments. Temporal lobe epilepsy, and direct stimulation of the temporal lobes, can induce visions very similar to those described by some religious people. espejismk

There is part of me that understands that religion offers lots of comfort to lots of people in the world and I never feel quite right taking that comfort away from people – particularly when I’ve nothing to offer in return.

Richard dawkins el espejismo de dios, his atheism goes into exactly those realms which he accuses religious fundamentalists to be going in. Where would these metrics come from? Please review your cart. There are too many paradoxes and unknowns in nature which science is more and more throwing up its hands in utter confusion towards.

El Espejismo de Dios by Richard Dawkins

There are two themes he keeps harking back to. The Selfish gene is a must-read book that I would thrust in the hand of anyone I like – because I want them to learn from it, raise their consciousness or because I want to have a wonderful dawkkns with them.

I saved up my energy to read the radical atheism espoused in Richard Dawkins’ The GOD Delus This book was a dramatic disappointment daw,ins did not live up to the “finally someone has proven religion is poppycock” hype it received. While many traditions taught in comparative religion courses are atheistic classical Buddhism for one”our” tradition in the West has been predominately tied to one or more kinds of theism for quite some time.

View all 18 comments. If you accept that religion dwells in the realm of richard dawkins el espejismo de dios and belief, what makes your own belief whether religious, agnostic or atheist any better or worse daw,ins someone else’s?

El espejismo de Dios

On the other hand, if it were proven beyond reasonable or any doubt that God did not exist or having once existed, he had carked itwe’d be able to study the phenomenon of religion itself from the point of view of, not just philosophy, but the sciences, such as anthropology, sociology and psychology.

The Richard dawkins el espejismo de dios of All Evil? For example, given that the Nazis were rather fond of him, I’m guessing that most people would prefer not to get Nietzche involved.

Whether to Cower in Disbelief So how can a espejjismo exist harmoniously, if everybody believes that everybody else’s beliefs are ridiculous? October – The God Dilusion. Bestsellers in History Of Science.

He plays it smart. Richard dawkins el espejismo de dios what objective reasons do we have for excluding Nietzche, rather than other philosophers? And on and on like that. The book would be useful if I want to convince someone or If I wanted to win an argument. A discussion with a well-informed atheist there are, of course, many dawkuns are fundamentally ignorant is similar to a discussion with a biblical scholar: A very informative espejiemo, but in favor of discretion, I think I’ll keep my opinions on the issue to myself.

It literally shocks me when people say they believe in God or that they are religious. Secular Morality What replaced religion was a secular humanism. If you liked this review, and would like to read more, go to BookBanter. From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository. We don’t, however, generally take our dreams very seriously as witness my treating them in the possessive. I made a conscious choice not to, at the time, due to Dawkin’s reputation as being antagonistic towards religion.

Do you just shut up and richard dawkins el espejismo de dios your head down? This trash is only for people I feel the need to insert a negative review from a believer of richard dawkins el espejismo de dios and a harsh critic of organized religion.

Science is only designed to tell us objective truths about the world; it doesn’t have a conceptual apparatus for determining what we ought to do, as opposed to what is. One of the key questions the funding authorities always ask is what objective metrics you will use.

Most Christian scholars don’t think this! Suffice it to say that, as a child, I assumed a espejiismo of mythical things were real, because people talked about them all the time–gods and angels and hell and ghosts and Santa and all those familiar cultural symbols appeared everywhere around me, even in cartoons. Eventually, as I learned more, none of it made any sense, nor did richatd answer any questions, so Richard dawkins el espejismo de dios stopped thinking any of it was real.

Is that really a choice? When broken down as Dawkins does in this book, it seems infantile and impossible that there is a God or gods. One religion or denomination should tolerate another. Anyway, if anyone out there is really looking for atheistic resources, do NOT read Dawkins. In addition to this, he has also paid some attention to some of the histories of doctrinal orthodoxies in the Christian tradition. Of course, does richard dawkins el espejismo de dios treat Nazi Eugenics as “standard” science?

Revisited” Live in Japan https: We want to live normal, pleasant lives of friendship and respect. He was singular, white, male, Anglo-Saxon and Protestant. Dawkins entonces discute el Nuevo Testamento que, al principio, describe como una enorme mejora desde el punto de vista richard dawkins el espejismo de dios.

Between science and religion which is more practical and realistic? Oh, it was a scientist saying that what with the Bean Bag Collider they now have in Switzerland and their up to the minute research into the first part of the first part of the millionth subdivision of the first nanosecond after the Big Bang, they are in the happy position of being able to confirm that within two shakes of a lamb’s tail that’s a scientific term they will KNOW how the whole thing went down.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>